January 8, 2007
When feminism and attractiveness collide
OK…this whole thing about feminists needing to hide away with hairy armpits and uncut hair needs to DIE.
I found a really neat blog entry by candyposes, who is a nude model that actually got turned down for a job because she’s a feminist. What, does the photog think that she’s going to snap and plaster him with NOW stickers?
The new wave of feminism is still trying to decide if it stands for open sexuality and the frank appreciation of the female form, or if it stands for restriction, censure of our own drives for pleasure and appreciation, and glorification of sensuality. We need to come to a consensus. No wonder girls are confused with what they see in the media today!
There are so many conflicting messages. Look at the Paris Hiltons of the world. Look at them showing off their coochies to all and sundry, with no real reverence for what they have between their legs. Then, look at the other side…women who fight against the rights of sex workers, or deride exotic dancers, or call miniskirts slutty and degrading. Neither view helps, and the reluctance of the old garde to acknowledge the reality of the new hobbles feminism from really becoming a solid part of American society.
Anyway, visit candyposes’ site, Feminism Without Clothes. She’s got some lovely pics, and she’s very interesting.
Related Posts
Too bad, so sad…giving the smackdown 6: Dawn Eden doesn’t like sex, and neither should we.
On being gothy, Black, and beautiful
Women Come In 12 Flavors: Female Stereotypes in Urban Culture
Please share me if you like me!
art, equality, feminism, photography, Sex and Sexuality The Arts












